Provider Exclusion and Sanctions List

Published by the New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services (as needed). New Hampshire's Provider Exclusion and Sanctions List. The state uses both words, and the reasons mix board actions, federal exclusions, and program sanctions. Healthcare organizations screen staff and vendors against it to protect their program participation and billing eligibility. This page shows aggregate statistics only; it never lists or searches individual records.

79

Excluded or sanctioned parties currently listed (records without a past reinstatement date).

79

Records on file, including any reinstated history the source publishes.

63 / 16

Individuals / businesses and other entities.

About this list

The New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services publishes this Provider Exclusion and Sanctions List from its Medicaid provider relations page. The state uses both words. At the August 2026 verification it held 76 entries: 63 individuals and 13 organizations. Three individual rows also name a business, so those entries are screened as both the person and the business. Nine entries are typed as Medicaid recipients rather than enrolled providers, and they remain on the published list.

Each entry carries a last name and first name, or a business name, a provider type, a national provider identifier when one is present, the reason in the state's own words, and an effective date. Reasons mix board actions, federal Office of Inspector General exclusions, Medicare revocations, and Medicaid fraud convictions. Fifty-one of the 76 entries carried a real NPI. Twenty used the literal marker n/a, four were blank, and one cell held a federal employer identification number rather than an NPI. New Hampshire publishes no date of birth, no license number, and no address. A candidate match here rests on name comparison, supported by an NPI where one is present, and needs more verification from the reviewer.

The workbook banner at verification read Updated 5/21/26. There is no published schedule and no reinstatement or end-date column. A party leaves the list only by being dropped from a later publication. A clean result against this list is not a finding that no New Hampshire sanction exists.

Our copy's freshness

ArtifactStatusLast verified pull (age, days)Records
full fresh 1.0 79

Every pull is archived with a SHA-256 checksum before parsing, and anomalous changes are quarantined automatically while the last verified version keeps serving. Live state for all sources is on the status board.

Recent versions

VerifiedRecordsChange
2026-09-14 79 -

HHS-OIG guidance (the 2013 Special Advisory Bulletin on the Effect of Exclusion) recommends monthly screening of employees and contractors. ExclusionSentry screens your roster against this list and 44 other sources on every run, with a timestamped audit PDF citing the exact source versions used.

Screen your roster See pricing View the official page

Check one name against the two federal lists, free

Same matching engine and archived source copies our customers screen with. The result appears on screen, usually within 30 seconds, and a PDF copy is emailed to you. Federal lists only; a no-match result is not a clearance determination.

No spam. Opt out any time.

More sources: Federal OIG LEIE · SAM.gov · New York · Texas · all 45